risk grade
Risk Grade
Make repair risk visible before confidence becomes assumption.
This page should help users understand how risky the repair context really is, why that level of risk exists, and what responsible next action looks like. It should feel calm, not alarming. The system is not here to scare people. It is here to show clear boundaries: when to proceed, when to proceed carefully, when to inspect further, and when not to rely on routine repair at all.
Assess the risk context
Choose only what affects consequences, uncertainty, and repair responsibility.
Risk outcome
The grade should say what it means, not only what it is.
The result will explain how role, consequence, environment, visibility, and certainty shaped the grade.
- Visible boundaries make recommendation more trustworthy.
- Risk should reflect consequence, not only repair confidence.
- Uncertainty should raise caution, not disappear from the result.
The grading system will recommend whether to proceed, proceed with caution, inspect further, or stop.
Good grading should make hidden limits visible before the repair feels more certain than it really is.
The next step should follow the grade, not fight it.
How to read the grades
The grade should stay practical and easy to act on.
Low / Moderate
Proceed when the situation is well understood and consequences remain limited.
- Damage visible
- Consequence limited
- Repair path understandable
Elevated
Proceed carefully, with clearer preparation, stricter inspection, and stronger respect for boundaries.
- Environment harsher
- Diagnosis less certain
- Failure would matter more
High / Not recommended
Do not let optimistic execution replace responsible judgment.
- Safety role significant
- Hidden damage likely
- Failure consequence serious
